Indonesia: land without Playboy and porn (Is that true?)

YOGYAKARTA, March 28, 2008 - Even fast between the companies by a law adopted yesterday was officially 'Information and Electronic Transaction Law' hot. This disguised anti-pornography legislation tomorrow. Because of the high speed at which the latest monstrosity against the freedom of the press is pushed through, there is little attention. It is a little here everyday it seems, but it is plainly absurd that a law approved yesterday, and three days later active, especially a law that will have as much impact as this one. Theoretically then.

The Act itself provides that any person who deals with the production of, or even watching pornographic material and ethically irresponsible to six years behind bars may disappear. On top is still a fine of up to 1 billion Rupiah (about 70,000 euros). A creator is thus punished as loud as a user. To prevent a user simply unwanted things on his screen it will in the future be a filter established by the internet providers. They must then go block this content. To make things speed up, the Ministry of Information for a free filter what can be downloaded on the website of the ministry.

With the above description it is clear that this legislation is a major gatenkaas, even if this in a country where corruption is something less than here. A government which states that 'something's coming' we now know all. From postponement comes adjustment, so that rural internetfilter sploh will never come. Moreover, such a thing be maintained, because the website is changing for many filter already sufficient to outside force to be. Maintenance is another weak point here in Indonesia, so if it ever established, it is already obsolete within a few days, and something that is outdated in the closet to put it is eaten by termites.

The adoption of a law is something else as their implementation. The penalty is the same for a producer as well as for a customer. Strange, but true. And if you do not want brommen you pay 1 billion fine. Hardly anyone has 1 billion here, not even in Rupiah, because that is 70,000 euro fine for watching a beautiful lady with a little less clothing than in the average FHM, because that has been good and will probably naked in the 'porn 'go. Thus the following problem. I have not read the new law, but the term "pornography" is of course open to wide interpretation. And that is wide indeed a bit funny intended.

A producer of photos with women who average fewer clothes to have their photos will not contain nudity, but art, or at the very least artistic freedom. However, a man who screams at a meeting that tourists maggots, worms and snakes, will probably consider that a woman without boerka (a penguin and popularly) ridiculous walking around naked, let alone the average tourist in Bali, such as the best man himself quoted. Given the wide range of views and assessments, there had better be defined exactly when someone or something can be classified as' porn ', although of course a completely absurd situation, but look:

"A photo of a woman with the shoulders completely uncovered and that the armpits under any angle to see. The woman needs to be clothes that double standards adopted to be wider than the actual size clothes that women need, for any forms of the body disguise, as it might have lead to the visibility of her underwear. hair of women should be at least ten centimeters lower than the shoulders hang to the possibility of a naked upper prevent. " And then it is not even talking about the actual porn where the legislation apparently not even a look at it, because such products are probably not sploh in Indonesia, at least, we believe that this is not the case, that there are no laws needed .

In a random photo shoot for FHM as a website will therefore probably a police officer on the ground should try to see if the situation fully in order. Should this not be the case then Mr. perhaps an extra zakcentje agent and he may also simply continue to look at the whole as fair exchange for his services. But it would obviously already quite ridiculous if it ever comes to that there are actually officials who go check, both on the street and on the internet. Unfortunately, that last thing aannemelijker, because if an invasion does to any Internet cafe since it is often quite a bit of money to get in exchange for the fact to take licences. Nothing statutory provision, but simply zakkenvullerij stick with the law with one another empty content.

What more needs to be feared are the people who are entirely voluntary, and often in the name of a religion, raise themselves as protectors of the unskilled people and law enforcement officials with their own laws. They will probably respond to welcome the introduction of such legislation unclear precisely so that they can steer in the direction they want to see. A new pole in joining the store then, and then the real anti-porn legislation has not even formally introduced. But with a weak group of representatives as in the Volksraad will also other laws of this radical soon as the agreement of a majority of them. Where it ends no one knows, but it would be instead of this ongein better able to deal with the real needs in Indonesia. Child pornography, for example, because nobody will tell me that something does not exist.

source: indonesiepagina.nl

So guys, are you agree with the title? "Indonesia: land without Playboy and porn?"

Then leave your comments down here....

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Yellowlightdistrict © 2007-2009 | Template by ilhamsaibi | Modified by nederindo